Thursday, February 12, 2026

I still have very strong feelings about Lobo


When you mix up universes, you don't get a lot of depth, but you do get some fun, and the backup stories in the recent Batman/Deadpool crossovers have been largely light and humorous affairs. There's not much more to say when you jam two characters with some vague connection - like magic or archery or being an animal - together in a five page story, other than 'look how cool it is to see these two dudes together', but at least they've got some fine artists doing their best to give you a good time.

Except for the bit with Logo - the amalgamated Lobo/Wolverine character - which was really fucking annoying, because I still have very strong feelings about Lobo.

Lobo is a heavy metal force of chaos, and the crazier his shit gets, the better it hits. I was genuinely appalled when they tried to make him more sleek and stylish a decade ago, and am happy to see they have walked Lobo back to his primal riff roots since then. 

So I'm a prime target for Lobo getting into some multiversal shenanigans in the new DC/Marvel crossovers, but then all they did was combine him with Wolverine, which is a real lowest common denominator kinda move.

For a starters, it's a stupid fucking name, which is much less wolf-ish and just makes me think of some stylised lettering. And he's really just Lobo with claws, which isn't very interesting. Wolverine is all restrained and civilised and honourable shit, and that gets steamrolled by Lobo's vicious anarchy, so it's all 'Bo and no Wolvie. (There's a reason the only successful amalgamated version of Lobo is when they combined him with Howard the Duck, because it's the absurdity, not the violence, that is the common factor there.)

And while there is little in the back-ups that resembles a proper story, the Logo bit just a gross attempt at post-credits titillation, and we all got sick of that shit a long time ago. Just have him bash against some angst ridden dweeb from the Marvel U. Don't water him down into a bad cover version.

No comments: