Never mind all those Dads who say that
there isn’t any smart writing on comics these days, and that the art of
critical thinking has been irreparably diluted by the sheer amount of
material on the internet, and that things aren’t as smart as they used to be,
and all that bullshit. They don’t know what they are talking about.
There has never been a more better time for
rich and thoughtful essays, blogs, reviews, interviews about comics. The world
is full of this sort of thing, and we all have access to it. This is a Golden
Age of Comic Thought, and more fool you if you can’t see it.
Those same Dads are always moaning about
the dire state of comics journalism, and can’t see the vast forest of knowledge
past their few ignorant trees. But this sort of complaint about the lack of critical thought is nothing new.
In an interview with the Comics Journal in 1994,
Neil Gaiman and Gary Groth had an exceedingly pleasant conversation that
strayed into the area of comics criticism, and both men took the opportunity to
bemoan the fact that there wasn’t a wide range of critical writing. They both
managed to dredge up a few examples, (and did an admirable job of not
mentioning the Journal itself, which is, was, and will always be a fine
source of critical thinking), but for the most part, they despaired about the
lack of real thought on comics.
But that was 1994, eighteen years ago, and
things have changed. The age of the Internet was just about to kick in, and
neither man could have predicted the explosion of writing about comics that
would produce, to the point where the kind of thing that were aching for in
that pre-web age is now everywhere on a daily basis.
To be fair, there is still a lot of crap to
wade through. A recent blog post by Dave Lartigue perfectly nailed the laziest
of critical thinking – throwing in a couple of post culture reference is not
the same as critical thought. Lartigue’s piece – which was better than zombie
apes and pirate ninjas dueling with light-sabers over one of Gil Gerard’s
white leotards that has caught fire, with bacon – pointed out that there are
smarter ways to express enthusiasm for something without resorting to easy
referencing
But while there are plenty of examples of
this, all over the place, there is also a lot of really intelligent and
thoughtful writing on the internet, with more showing up every single day. In
blogs alone, there is Colin Smith's unwaveringly polite devotion to comics
craft, or the brilliant pieces of character analysis on Tim O’Neil’s site, or
J Caleb Mozzocco’s ongoing quests for simple pleasures. Group blogs like Savage Critics, the Factual Opinion and Mindless Ones have
individual identities that demand excellence and decry mediocrity.
Lovely people like Tom Spurgeon, Graeme McMillan and Sean T Collins provide essential linking, and old
warhorses like the Comics Journal are still helping out, with strong writing on
both print and screen.
And this isn’t even getting into comic
videos and podcasts. There are too many to keep track of, and not enough free
time in the day to listen to them all, although it is possible to follow a
couple faithfully (I never miss an episode of House to Astonish and Wait, What?)
All of this, and so much more, creates The
Conversation, which I think is always worth listening to.
The Conversation about comics is a vast and
sprawling thing, that spreads between a dozen main websites and dozens more
blogs and online columns and magazine articles. It’s never talking about one
single thing – the only thing connecting all these threads together is an
interest in the form, medium and business of comics.
Sometimes, a large part of the conversation
gets fixated on a single aspect of the medium – in recent months, Before
Watchmen has been on a lot of peoples’ minds, and has generated an incredible
amount of debate and reasoning. It can all get a bit much, (especially when the
only sensible option for dealing with this kind of appalling idea is to give it no
oxygen at all), but it’s not everything.
There are still hundreds of other parts in
the Conversation which are more interested in things like Chris Ware’s new box
of books, or the new stash of mini-comics snapped up at some dreary suburban
comic convention, or a debate on the merits of some almost-forgotten artist
from decades ago.
Sometimes it can get into things I’m not
bothered about – I’m right behind everybody who says the Kirby estate deserve a
bigger cut of the Avengers pie, but a lot of this discussion gets bogged down
in a boring focus on the money. And while it is a phenomenal amount of money,
it’s not the most important part.
There isn’t as much talk about the fact
that concepts and ideas that Jack came up with decades ago are finally becoming
the most absolutely mainstream thing, and the ideas that he had with Stan back
in the day, and passed on and built upon by hundreds of other talented creators,
are now taking root in the minds of a new generation. I’m far more interested
in hearing that side of the deal.
It's an endless discussion. It's loud, occasionally obnoxious and can get very, very weary. But while there has never been more rubbish to wade through, the riches that can be dug out are like nothing else.
The Conversation – as far as I’m hearing it
– is composed of all sorts of voices saying all sorts of different things, talking about everything to do with comics. There is loads and loads of smart thinking, some really charming humour and an unbridled love for comic books. Anybody with any interest in the form, medium, industry and life of the comic book world can't help eavesdropping, and might even contribute to the beautiful noise.
3 comments:
Post a Comment