One of the things that is most enjoyable
about buying back issue comics from a couple of decades ago are the
advertisements. We all hate them when they are new, but give them enough time
and they shine a sociological light on the darkest recesses of pop culture.
It’s not just the obvious stuff, like the
sea monkeys or the $1.79 locker of army soldiers or the Hostess cake stuff or
the X-Ray specs, it’s the stuff we’d all rather forget that often resonates
most strongly.
While it’s not surprising to see how many
ads there are for Star Wars products late seventies comic books, it’s a little
astonishing to see how many David Cassidy tee-shirts there are in endless
seventies adverts, and how big somebody like that teen heart-throb can get,
before crashing back into obscurity.
The first attempts to make serious money
out of this bizarre little hobby we call comic books can also be seen in these
thirty-years-old advertisements. Some of the most well-known Golden Age comics
were actually worth hundreds of dollars by the 1970s, and mail-order companies
realised that advertising in then-modern books was the best way to reach their
customers.
(As somebody who hit prime superhero
fascination sometime in the mid-eighties, I still have an inordinate fondness
for those yellow Mile High advertisements that listed huge amounts of comics
for sale for 50 cents each. I used to go through them with a magnifying glass,
composing imaginary lists of what I would buy if I had the undreamed-of sum of
$100. This is about as sad and pathetic as I ever got in my comic obsession.)
But the very best thing about old
advertisements are the house ads, showing covers from other series from that
publisher. It’s an absolute joy to run across a full page ad featuring
contemporary comics when I’m halfway through a random issue of Teen Titans from
1975, when DC had people like Carmine Infantino and Joe Kubert producing bloody
beautiful cover designs.
There can also be a cheap thrill of an ad
in the back of an Avengers comic promising the debut of a new series called
Tomb Of Dracula, or seeing other historic issues jumbled up with a bunch of
comics that were forgotten the month after they were published.
So that’s something to look forward to in
2042, because current Marvel and DC comics are choked with house ads.
Consider Action Comics #3 – another
imaginative and witty script from Grant Morrison (even if the xenophobic
reaction to what appears to be first contact with an alien race in the new DC
Universe is massively disappointing), with some rushed artwork from Gene Ha and
Rags Morales that occasionally hits the mark.
But it’s also a comic book that is
literally half full of advertisements, with just twenty pages of comic in a
forty page-issue. There is just not enough comic in my comic.
The rest of it is full page spreads for
comics and characters I’m not interested in, padded out by blatant advertorial
and silly back-matter. The editors are trying to give something the substance
of a decent DVD extra, but it’s just lots of art we all saw on the internet
three months ago, and creators revealing that they are really excited about
working with Creator X on Character X. It’s bad enough when Marvel’s
collections are padded out with pointless interviews from Marvel Spotlight,
doing that in a flimsy single issue is just wrong.
This would be a lot easier to swallow, if
the comic didn’t cost 33 per cent more than most of its contemporaries - $3.99
for a twenty page comic is bad enough, but when you’re paying that much for
that much advert, you’ve got to start wondering why you’re paying it at all.
With exchange rates and shipping costs,
these $3.99 comics cost nearly ten bucks in local money, which means every page
is costing me fifty cents. Which also means that a two page spread costs me $1,
and that is a harsh and difficult investment to make.
(I’m also still bitter about the way The
Boys was jacked up in price with absolutely no explanation two-thirds of the
way through it’s long – but limited – run.)
The ad situation isn’t as bad as a few
years back, when NuMarvel choked the life out their stories with a ridiculous
amount of advertising, destroying any storytelling or dramatic drive by cutting
up every page. But that kind of thoughtlessness is still there, (whoever decided
to put a full page picture of an intentionally smug blonde news anchor for the
Onion News Network right next to the most dramatic part of All Star Western #2
almost destroyed that moment entirely).
These ads will be fascinating for future
comic scholars, but in the here and now, they’re nothing that hasn’t already
been all over the internet for months, all the art previews and creator
interviews are almost totally worthless when there is so much of that for free
for anybody with a net connection of any kind – expecting readers of a Morrison
comic to pay extra for a couple of interviews with Dan Jurgens is asking a bit
much.
I don’t mind the twenty-page comic,
especially when writers like Morrison can tell super-compressed stories,
cutting whole scenes down to one pertinent panel.
But there is little real value for money,
and if this kind of ratio of story to ad just does not stack up. If continued,
it would surely see me drop one of my deadest favourite superhero comics,
because of dollar double-page spreads and extras I didn’t ask for or want in
any way.
There is always more value in actual comic,
and it’s good to hear that the writer of the excellent Brave and Bold is coming
in with some back-up stories in future issues. While DC is still making the
classic mistake of thinking that people read Grant Morrison’s comics for his
characters and concepts, rather than for his Celtic wit and deft storytelling
touch, Sholly Fisch is a terrific writer of short, sharp
entertainments, and it will be interesting to see if the humour and humanity of
the cartoon comic’s stories can be transferred to current continuity.
But it’s the thoughtlessness of padding out
these comics with things that might actively put people off the title that
really bites, along with the blithe and arrogant presumption that they can
charge whatever the hell they want, people will still buy it. While this has
short term gains, there is nothing to be gained in annoying the small amount of
readers modern comics have left with inappropriate use of ads.
There might be a solid business plan behind
masses of house advertisements, but that doesn’t mean it makes editorial sense
to mess with the flow of a story like this.
It’s good to support comics in their
monthly format, if only so the artists involved get the chance to do things
like eat and clothe themselves while they’re working on a project. And
collections are often little better, with the interminable Handbook entries and
pencilled versions of pages you read five minutes ago.
It might sound picky and pedantic, but the
use of advertorial and the lack of value for money is one of the main reasons
why I don’t buy more than half a dozen comic books every month, even though I
am actually interested in reading so much more. Ten bucks for twenty pages of
superhero comic just isn’t worth it, no matter who is writing it, and it’s just
easier to not bother with new comics, and wait a few years – or decades -
before coming back to these stories.
I can wait.
1 comment:
I'm with you there. NZ$10.25 for 20 pages of a US$3.99 Marvel comic interspersed with 10 pages of ads? Totally not worth it. The New52 isn't much better, NZ$7.95 for a $US2.99 of 20 pages interspersed with house ads for titles I already know about,and don't want to buy. Also, because they are almost all house ads and look a lot like the story artwork, I find them incredibly distracting - although in the case of most of the New52 that may be intentional on DC's part.
Unfortunately for my local comic store, whilst the pound is so low and I can buy TPBs from the Book Depository at up to 30% off cover price with no postage to NZ, he's not getting much business from me anymore.
kiwijohn
Post a Comment