You’re not supposed to compare apples and
oranges, but I do like apples more.
I also think some of Norwegian artist
Jason’s work is masterful comics, with a brevity and wit that gives his
storytelling universal appeal, while the latest collection of Iron Man comics that
I got to read was fuckin’ rubbish
On a recent Sunday afternoon, I read a
bunch of comic books in a (not entirely successful) bid to calm Rugby World
Cup-shredded nerves. Rugby is my sport, I’m allowed to be nervous.
Most of them were from the local library,
and some were pretty good. It can take me a while to catch up on things, but it’s
easy enough to follow work like Peter Milligan’s currently excellent Hellblazer
comics, or a bunch of different superhero titles for free from the local.
The latest round of Captain America and
Spider-Man trade paperbacks were both entirely enjoyable (if incomplete), I
really liked Bone Sharps, Cowboys, & Thunder Lizards and while Flash: Rebirth and Superman:
Grounded were both better than I actually expected, I had the lowest of all
expectations in the first place, so that wasn’t saying much.
But the biggest contrast came between What
I Did by Jason, and Iron Man: Stark Resilient volume one by Matt Fraction and
Salvador Larroca. One of them was a charming and entertaining read that managed
to touch on some universally human themes, while the other was a turgid and
sneering comic that looked shiny and didn’t go anywhere.
Guess which one was which?
I feel like I’m being unduly harsh on the
Iron Man book because I read it in such close proximity to the Jason comic and
Jason’s stuff is Always Good. But it killed any interest I had in the current
Iron Man comic stone dead, and I won’t be bothering with it any more.
It didn’t even cost me anything, I’ve been
eagerly getting it for the library, waiting for it to get good. There was
plenty of potential, but it was largely unfulfilled, and it’s taking too long.
I just can’t be bothered keeping track of it any more, and I left volume two of
Stark Resilient on the shelf just yesterday.
I think my last interest vanished somewhere
about the ninth time a bunch of characters all stood around talking about the
same things, over and over again. It’s not just that they’re saying the same
old shit, or have substituted snarky sarcasm for actual human conversation,
it’s just got dullness built into the foundation of the page
And it’s not just that Larroca has now
carefully erased all vigour out of his artistic line, and draws everybody like
they just escaped from the set of Westworld. It’s the way the whole thing is
paced out. It is the long and drawn out sequences that go nowhere, acted out by
things that don’t look like proper humans.
But most of all, it’s these bloody
inexplicable widescreen panels that serve no purpose:
What is going on here with all this empty nothingness?
Who thought this was a good idea to leave vast amounts of the page useless?
Who thought it should go on for page after
page like this, stacking up panels like they are cumbersome pieces of timber:
There are pages and pages of this, with
stacks of widescreen panels with a whole lot of nothing on either side. Individual
panels that are just huge wastes of space, especially when they seem to rely on
portraying an intricate piece of human emotion, and totally fail to do so.
Look at this!
Leave aside those freaky mannequin arms
which seem to be springing from some different person entirely, there is that
space on either side of the panel, that endless dull wall of nothin’ much. It’s
going for mood, but it just comes off as boring and stale
They should start putting advertising
there. At least it’s something. Look! There is heaps of room, as I have proven
with my tremendous MS Paint skillz:
It took me ages to get through this comic,
and this dedication to boring did not help. And when things ended with another
non-ending, and even more doses of fuck-all, that was enough to say no more.
Then I read a Jason book and I felt much
better about comics again.
I’m so glad that Jason is ridiculously
prolific, but there seems to be a new book by the Norwegian cartoonist every
second time I go to the library, and I devour each one (and go on to buy a few
more).
What I Did is a collection of some of his
earlier works, and I’ve already got Hey Wait sitting on the bookshelf like all
right-thinking people do. But it also has ‘Shhh’ - one of his silent stories,
that hovers on the edge of a dream without any possibility of waking up; and
The Iron Wagon - a straight adaption of a strange and spooky little novel from
the turn of last century.
As always, Jason’s anthropomorphic
characters are fill of silent pain and dignity, maintaining straight backs as
their heads spin off into delirium. His sense of comic timing is unparalleled
in modern comics, and while his pacing often appears languid, there is a lot
going on beneath that stiff surface.
So I know I shouldn’t compare the two, but
after the thoroughly depressing widescreen of Iron Man, Jason’s work was a good
and timely reminder of everything that is great about comics – telling tiny
little epics in four panels:
Or sliding around on angles to give the perfect
perspective and some terrific tension on a small and important event.
(particularly tasty after the endless medium close-ups that plagued Iron Man,
even in the action scenes):
It’s really great comics, and insanely
readable. While the Iron Man book took me ages to get through, I blew through
What I Did in no time at all, in the best possible way.
I’m still old enough and dorky enough to
remember the endless Iron Man vs X-Men debate that raged in Wizard for years,
but this is much easier. Jason v Iron Man?
Or
Bad luck, Tony Stark. No contest.
Jason wins!
2 comments:
Excellent points!
I find it curious that it took you longer to read through Iron man than Jason's comic book, which appears denser. I'd have expected the opposite, with all that empty space and one line per panel.
I wonder who's to blame for this? The writer or the artist? I think it's the writer; I suspect most of those guys no longer care about writing panel descriptions and pointing out angles and perspective - they just write "Tony Start and two dues are standing in the middle of a rom" and just leave the design to the artist. And people being lazy, the artist will go for the laziest angle possible - medium shots and bland backgrounds. If the writer doesn't tell him WHAT to fill the background with, the artist is being paid to come up with it. He's not the one writing the story.
That's my opinion - it's indeed an annoying trend and I think it's mainstream comics horrible.
Hi Bob great piece. Linked to this site from here:
http://captaincomics.ning.com/forum/topics/a-defence-of-text-in-comics?commentId=3370054%3AComment%3A286509&xg_source=activity
Post a Comment