(Warning, this post contains big-ass
spoilers for Criminal: The Last Of The Innocent)
After decades of comics showing that
committing any sort of crime has some sort of consequences, it’s actually
slightly jarring to read one where the main character commits a heinous and
violent murder, and totally gets away with it.
On the other hand, since this is happening
in the pages of a Criminal storyline, and since Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips have
delighted in playing off genre convention with unexpected results since the
first book, it shouldn’t be all that surprising.
For reasons far too boring to go into here,
I only get Criminal when it is collected in a trade paperback, even though I
happily buy a new issue of Incognito – and now Fatale – every month.
There is just something so satisfying about
a Criminal story when it is full and complete, and can be read in one sitting. Each
one is an absolute delight – the most efficient comic on the market also comes with
deadly doses of darkness and weird emotional epiphanies.
Despite being extraordinarily late in jumping on the Criminal bandwagon, I now get each new book as soon as it comes out.
This means I have to wait a few months, but that’s okay – I can wait.
What I can’t do is avoid general reviews.
While I have no desire to spoil anything, I can’t help skimming through reviews
and previews, just to get an idea of the general critical vibe.
That vibe was – as usual – almost uniformly
positive for the first few issues of Last of the Innocents. The inspired use of
Archie analogues gave this particular slice of noir an extra emotional punch,
and, as many noted, it was a story that could only ever really work as a comic.
You couldn’t evoke that Archie atmosphere and get a similar effect in a movie
or TV show.
But while the series still featured on a
number of ‘Best Of’ lists at the end of the year, the vibe was hit by a nagging
sense of disappointment when the final issue rolled around. While many critics
and readers appreciated the ending - in which the Archie character kills the
Veronica and Jughead analogues and totally gets away with it - there were many
others who felt that this particular Criminal ballad ended on a flat note.
It’s easy to see where they are coming
from. After Riley Richards stabs his beloved Felix in the eye with an ice pick,
there is a creeping sense of dread and despair. There is no way Riley can get
away with it, especially when his enemies (and best friend) know exactly what
he has done. Some kind of terrible retribution is inevitable.
But it’s also totally avoidable. Stories
don’t always go the way they should, and Riley ends up with his dream girl, the
beach house and the millions of dollars. He’s killed his best friend and his
wife, and there are hints of regret in those final pages, but they are only
hints. Riley has simplified his world again and he figured it was worth the
cost.
I admit - my first reaction to Last of the Innocents
was vague dissatisfaction, because I was expecting some kind of gory and
intense end, and it just didn’t happen like that. But I’ve been more than
satisfied with it on subsequent re-readings, because I didn’t know what the
story was the first time round.
This isn’t the story about a man being
punished for his terrible crime, it’s about a man willing to go to horrible
lengths in a bid to get his life back into a teenage ideal.
And this kind of ending, where crime
actually pays, is genuinely unexpected. Everything else in the genre, from the
EC crime comics of the fifties to David Lapham’s mad Stray Bullets, has shown
that committing a crime has some sort of consequence. Even people who aren’t
punished by the law face some sort of karmic justice, or are mentally destroyed
by the experience. Because crime is bad, and nobody gets away with it.
Which isn’t always how it works in the real
world. Despite nightly doses of CSI bollocks on the TV every night, a lot of
people do get away with all sorts of crimes. These types of things don’t always
wrap up nicely.
And Brubaker has been using that
expectation against us since the end of the first volume where a mortally
wounded Leo was supposed to slip away into death as police come closer – eyes
flutter, police lights blur, roll credits – but finds it’s a lot easier to kill
than it is to die.
While this kind of ending is difficult to
pull off, Brubaker and Phillips just keep on doing it, to the benefit of the
larger story they are telling.
Creating a good crime comic is a lot harder
than it looks – Vertigo’s recent line of original crime novels have produced a
lot of mediocrity, and nothing truly great – but Criminal is Brubaker’s best
work, and his obvious love for the genre shines through on every page.
It’s not just the unexpected twists and
turns the plot takes, it’s the overall story of generations of crime, making
the same old violent mistakes and (not always) suffering terrible fates. And
it’s the gorgeous and moody art by Sean Phillips. And it's the little connections to the greater criminal story, with Sebastian Hyde and Teeg Lawless showing up. And it’s the fact that it’s
also still very funny – the line about Riley only really existing when people
were watching him was a cracker – with the crispest dialogue around, making
each new volume absolutely entertaining
Like several other stories in the series,
Criminal: The Last of the Innocents doesn’t end like you think it would or
should, and the story it’s telling might not be obvious from a first reading,
but that’s what I dig the most.
No comments:
Post a Comment